++ 0% (Reading text)
++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
++ 15% (Drawing inferences)
In Part 1 - Definitions, Section 1.1 - Library Message values in the extension
Italian by Leonardo Boselli:
The sentence 'The library message ids are defined by the table of
library messages' italian by leonardo
boselli (which asserts that 'LibMsg <examine while
dark>'
(Leonardo Boselli/Italian.i7x, line 461) is/are 'library message ids' italian by leonardo
boselli) seems to be talking about a previously
unknown room or thing called LibMsg <examine while dark>. Ordinarily, I
would create this, but because the name contains the word 'when' or 'while'
I'm going to say no. That's because this far more often happens by mistake
than deliberately. For instance, people sometimes type lines like 'Jumping
when the actor is on the trampoline is high-jumping.' But in fact although
'jumping' is an action, 'Jumping when...' is not - 'when' can't be used
here (though it can be used in rule preambles). So the sentence is instead
read as making an object 'jumping when the actor' and putting it on top of
another one, 'trampoline is high-jumping'. This can lead to a lot of
confusion. If you genuinely do want an object whose name contains the word
'when', try something like: 'In the box is a thing called When worlds
collide.'
In row 103 of 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
boselli, the entry 'LibMsg <examine while dark>' italian by leonardo
boselli seems not to have defined a thing there, so
perhaps the first column did not consist of new names?
The sentence 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
boselli (which asserts that 'LibMsg <search while
dark>'
(Leonardo Boselli/Italian.i7x, line 462) is/are 'library message ids' italian by leonardo
boselli) seems to be talking about a previously
unknown room or thing called LibMsg <search while dark>. Ordinarily, I
would create this, but because the name contains the word 'when' or 'while'
I'm going to say no. That's because this far more often happens by mistake
than deliberately. For instance, people sometimes type lines like 'Jumping
when the actor is on the trampoline is high-jumping.' But in fact although
'jumping' is an action, 'Jumping when...' is not - 'when' can't be used
here (though it can be used in rule preambles). So the sentence is instead
read as making an object 'jumping when the actor' and putting it on top of
another one, 'trampoline is high-jumping'. This can lead to a lot of
confusion. If you genuinely do want an object whose name contains the word
'when', try something like: 'In the box is a thing called When worlds
collide.'
In row 104 of 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
boselli, the entry 'LibMsg <search while dark>' italian by leonardo
boselli seems not to have defined a thing there, so
perhaps the first column did not consist of new names?
The sentence 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
boselli (which asserts that 'LibMsg <look under
while dark>' italian by leonardo
boselli is/are 'library message ids' italian by leonardo
boselli) seems to be talking about a previously
unknown room or thing called LibMsg <look under while dark>. Ordinarily, I
would create this, but because the name contains the word 'when' or 'while'
I'm going to say no. That's because this far more often happens by mistake
than deliberately. For instance, people sometimes type lines like 'Jumping
when the actor is on the trampoline is high-jumping.' But in fact although
'jumping' is an action, 'Jumping when...' is not - 'when' can't be used
here (though it can be used in rule preambles). So the sentence is instead
read as making an object 'jumping when the actor' and putting it on top of
another one, 'trampoline is high-jumping'. This can lead to a lot of
confusion. If you genuinely do want an object whose name contains the word
'when', try something like: 'In the box is a thing called When worlds
collide.'
In row 105 of 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
boselli, the entry 'LibMsg <look under while dark>' italian by leonardo
boselli seems not to have defined a thing there, so
perhaps the first column did not consist of new names?
The sentence 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
boselli (which asserts that 'LibMsg <cannot exit
when not within anything>' italian by leonardo
boselli is/are 'library message ids' italian by leonardo
boselli) seems to be talking about a previously
unknown room or thing called LibMsg <cannot exit when not within anything>.
Ordinarily, I would create this, but because the name contains the word
'when' or 'while' I'm going to say no. That's because this far more often
happens by mistake than deliberately. For instance, people sometimes type
lines like 'Jumping when the actor is on the trampoline is high-jumping.'
But in fact although 'jumping' is an action, 'Jumping when...' is not -
'when' can't be used here (though it can be used in rule preambles). So the
sentence is instead read as making an object 'jumping when the actor' and
putting it on top of another one, 'trampoline is high-jumping'. This can
lead to a lot of confusion. If you genuinely do want an object whose name
contains the word 'when', try something like: 'In the box is a thing called
When worlds collide.'
In row 161 of 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
boselli, the entry 'LibMsg <cannot exit when not
within anything>' italian by leonardo
boselli seems not to have defined a thing there, so
perhaps the first column did not consist of new names?
In Part 1 - Definitions, Section 1.1 - Library Message values in the extension
Italian by Leonardo Boselli:
You wrote 'The tenses are past tense and present tense' italian by leonardo
boselli: but this seems to say that a general
description is something else, like saying that 'a door is 20'.
++ Ended: Translation failed: 9 problems found