++ 0% (Reading text)
++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
++ 15% (Drawing inferences)
In Part 1 - Definitions, Section 1.1 - Library Message values in the extension
  Italian by Leonardo Boselli:  
 The sentence 'The library message ids are defined by the table of
    library messages' italian by leonardo
    boselli (which asserts that 'LibMsg <examine while
    dark>' 
(Leonardo Boselli/Italian.i7x, line 461)    is/are 'library message ids' italian by leonardo
    boselli) seems to be talking about a previously
    unknown room or thing called LibMsg <examine while dark>. Ordinarily, I
    would create this, but because the name contains the word 'when' or 'while'
    I'm going to say no. That's because this far more often happens by mistake
    than deliberately. For instance, people sometimes type lines like 'Jumping
    when the actor is on the trampoline is high-jumping.' But in fact although
    'jumping' is an action, 'Jumping when...' is not - 'when' can't be used
    here (though it can be used in rule preambles). So the sentence is instead
    read as making an object 'jumping when the actor' and putting it on top of
    another one, 'trampoline is high-jumping'. This can lead to a lot of
    confusion. If you genuinely do want an object whose name contains the word
    'when', try something like: 'In the box is a thing called When worlds
    collide.'  
 In row 103 of 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
    boselli, the entry 'LibMsg <examine while dark>' italian by leonardo
    boselli seems not to have defined a thing there, so
    perhaps the first column did not consist of new names?  
 The sentence 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
    boselli (which asserts that 'LibMsg <search while
    dark>' 
(Leonardo Boselli/Italian.i7x, line 462)    is/are 'library message ids' italian by leonardo
    boselli) seems to be talking about a previously
    unknown room or thing called LibMsg <search while dark>. Ordinarily, I
    would create this, but because the name contains the word 'when' or 'while'
    I'm going to say no. That's because this far more often happens by mistake
    than deliberately. For instance, people sometimes type lines like 'Jumping
    when the actor is on the trampoline is high-jumping.' But in fact although
    'jumping' is an action, 'Jumping when...' is not - 'when' can't be used
    here (though it can be used in rule preambles). So the sentence is instead
    read as making an object 'jumping when the actor' and putting it on top of
    another one, 'trampoline is high-jumping'. This can lead to a lot of
    confusion. If you genuinely do want an object whose name contains the word
    'when', try something like: 'In the box is a thing called When worlds
    collide.'  
 In row 104 of 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
    boselli, the entry 'LibMsg <search while dark>' italian by leonardo
    boselli seems not to have defined a thing there, so
    perhaps the first column did not consist of new names?  
 The sentence 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
    boselli (which asserts that 'LibMsg <look under
    while dark>' italian by leonardo
    boselli is/are 'library message ids' italian by leonardo
    boselli) seems to be talking about a previously
    unknown room or thing called LibMsg <look under while dark>. Ordinarily, I
    would create this, but because the name contains the word 'when' or 'while'
    I'm going to say no. That's because this far more often happens by mistake
    than deliberately. For instance, people sometimes type lines like 'Jumping
    when the actor is on the trampoline is high-jumping.' But in fact although
    'jumping' is an action, 'Jumping when...' is not - 'when' can't be used
    here (though it can be used in rule preambles). So the sentence is instead
    read as making an object 'jumping when the actor' and putting it on top of
    another one, 'trampoline is high-jumping'. This can lead to a lot of
    confusion. If you genuinely do want an object whose name contains the word
    'when', try something like: 'In the box is a thing called When worlds
    collide.'  
 In row 105 of 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
    boselli, the entry 'LibMsg <look under while dark>' italian by leonardo
    boselli seems not to have defined a thing there, so
    perhaps the first column did not consist of new names?  
 The sentence 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
    boselli (which asserts that 'LibMsg <cannot exit
    when not within anything>' italian by leonardo
    boselli is/are 'library message ids' italian by leonardo
    boselli) seems to be talking about a previously
    unknown room or thing called LibMsg <cannot exit when not within anything>.
    Ordinarily, I would create this, but because the name contains the word
    'when' or 'while' I'm going to say no. That's because this far more often
    happens by mistake than deliberately. For instance, people sometimes type
    lines like 'Jumping when the actor is on the trampoline is high-jumping.'
    But in fact although 'jumping' is an action, 'Jumping when...' is not -
    'when' can't be used here (though it can be used in rule preambles). So the
    sentence is instead read as making an object 'jumping when the actor' and
    putting it on top of another one, 'trampoline is high-jumping'. This can
    lead to a lot of confusion. If you genuinely do want an object whose name
    contains the word 'when', try something like: 'In the box is a thing called
    When worlds collide.'  
 In row 161 of 'Table of library messages' italian by leonardo
    boselli, the entry 'LibMsg <cannot exit when not
    within anything>' italian by leonardo
    boselli seems not to have defined a thing there, so
    perhaps the first column did not consist of new names?
 In Part 1 - Definitions, Section 1.1 - Library Message values in the extension
  Italian by Leonardo Boselli:  
 You wrote 'The tenses are past tense and present tense' italian by leonardo
    boselli: but this seems to say that a general
    description is something else, like saying that 'a door is 20'.
++ Ended: Translation failed: 9 problems found